Click icon or label to view this node's details

Analysis of dimensions drawn from the Shaping forms. This was created by looking at each of the Shaping forms for the eight sessions and identifying aspects that were common characteristics, especially where it was apparent that the sessions fell along a spectrum.

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Choice of method
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Granularity of the pre-created structure
Shaping Analysis

Focus on the structure of the pre-created map(s) themselves, rather than what the practitioners intended to do with them (which is more 'approach').

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Ambitiousness of the planned approach
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How much of the shaping and process is emergent vs. pre-determined
Shaping Analysis

During the session itself, shaping and process sometimes follows the pre-determined course, and sometimes takes its own "emergent" direction. Not a judgement on the quality of the direction, just a characterization one way or the other.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How much practitioner adherence to the method during the session
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of divergence from plan
Shaping Analysis

This looks at participant (as opposed to practitioner) role in adherence to plan/agenda.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Density of practitioner verbal moves (frequent vs infrequent)
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Practitioner willingness to intervene - frequency and depth of intervention
Shaping Analysis

The emphasis being on willingness to intervene when things threaten to go off the rails or where there is a strong need to do so.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

High practitioner "drive" of the session vs high participant "drive"
Shaping Analysis

Combined with "Degree of practitioner ÒcontrolÓ over the conversation/process"

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of practitioner-asked clarifying questions in response to participant input
Shaping Analysis

Clarifying not necessarily (but not exclusive) of mapping; could be just clarifying the verbal statements.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree to which practitioners requested validation of their changes to the representation
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of practitioner "gating" of participant input
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of intervention to get participants to look at the representation
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of collaboration between multiple practitioners
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of collaboration between practitioners and participants
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Multiplicity/heterogeneity of focus aspects
Shaping Analysis

How much/many different aspects did practitioners have to deal with Ð participants, maps, text, subject matter, surroundings, process. This is assessed based on the grid analysis. So for the Ames and Rutgers sessions it is just for the sensemaking episodes, while for the Mobile Agents sessions it's the whole session. Calculated based on number of x's in the grid analysis focus section divided by number of rows with x's.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Shaping Analysis
Where on the spectrum from "discussionish" to "mapish"
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How successful was the session?
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of expressed participant resistance, disagreement, etc.
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of "noise"
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of "meta" discussion (how are we doing, how should the shaping be done, etc.)
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How much attention to visual/spatial refinement of shaping
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How much attention to textual refinement of shaping
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

How much attention to hypertextual refinement of shaping
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of "finishedness" of the artifacts
Shaping Analysis

Judgement based on final state

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Multiplicity/heterogeneity of move types/categories; diversity of move types
Shaping Analysis

This is assessed based on the grid analysis. So for the Amessessions it is just for the sensemaking episodes, while for the Mobile Agents sessions it's the whole session. Rutgers had Camtasia issues so there are no move counts since screen recordings are unavailable. Calculated based on number of different move types in the grid analysis divided by number of total number of moves.

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Density of practitioner shaping moves (frequent vs infrequent)
Shaping Analysis

This is assessed based on the grid analysis. So for the Ames and Rutgers sessions it is just for the sensemaking episodes, while for the Mobile Agents sessions it's the whole session. Calculated based on number of x's for Maps and Text in the focus section divided by number of rows with x's (total # of moves).

Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Degree of "exclusive"/delinked practitioner interaction with the representation
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Complexity of the software techniques in use
Shaping Analysis
Shaping Dimension

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon to view map contents

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Click icon or label to view this node's details

Click icon or label to view this node's details