Discussion Papers | Workshop Report & Notes

Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation for Learning Communities

11th - 12th December, 1999, Stanford University
http://kmi.open.ac.uk/sbs/csca/cscl99/

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning'99
12th - 15th December

http://sll-6.stanford.edu/CSCL99/

 

Position papers are requested for the first workshop on Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation (CSCA) to be held at a CSCL conference, initiated to recognise the critical mass of argumentation research that has developed in recent years. The workshop aims to build links between researchers from diverse backgrounds, and to focus future technical and conceptual efforts.

Workshop Topics

Argumentation research has roots in fields including philosophy, education and design theory. CSCA is concerned with the design of human-computer interaction to augment and mediate argumentation in groups, and broadly, addresses the problems of supporting individuals or groups in:

Analysing the structure of ideas and ill-structured problems
and
Representing and debating the merits of different perspectives.

This workshop is focused on the intersection between CSCA and CSCL: what properties of CSCA environments can support learning? "Learning" is defined from a lifelong learning perspective, embracing physical and distributed communities of practice in both academic school/university contexts, and professional workplaces.

CSCA's successes and failures result from complex interactions between factors including domain and argumentation knowledge, training in CSCA tools, user interface design, and motivation to use CSCA. A focus on any one factor in isolation has proven to be shortsighted.

Submissions are invited to illuminate the core question:

  • In what contexts are CSCA tools most effectively deployed?

Related issues include:

  • What is the scope and representational granularity of CSCA tools?
  • CSCA for learning? What evidence do you have that your system (or one you've evaluated) supports learning in your user community? What are the key factors that promote effective use?
  • What didn't work? Reflect on failures in deploying your system (or one you've evaluated).
  • How did you evaluate your system? Evaluative data is expensive to collect and analyze. What kinds of data does/could your CSCA system capture? How can it be analyzed? What counts as 'good evidence' in your domain?
  • What is 'CSCA literacy'? All scholars and analysts are supposed to be able to engage in structured, critical reasoning, but CSCA tools typically require modes of interaction that make that structure explicit. When is this a problem and when an advantage? What skills/training are needed in order to use your system effectively?
  • Technologies: How does your system work? What are the key interactional/user interface issues? Does your CSCA system integrate with other systems? What would a next generation CSCA environment look like?
  • Integrating CSCA resources. How can the CSCA community better leverage its parallel efforts?

Intended Audiences

We invite participation from researchers and practitioners actively engaged in the design or evaluation of CSCA systems for learning communities:

Pre-Workshop Activities

The workshop is adopting the 'bootstrapping' approach of using its own tools to represent its own ideas, with the goal of grounding online and face-face discussions in real, familiar examples:

Workshop Format

The workshop adopts an innovative format, starting Saturday afternoon, followed by dinner and informal discusion, concluding the following morning. The program will build on the pre-workshop discussion amongst participants, prioritising discussion, software demonstrations and design critiques to make the best use of our time together.

Post-Workshop Activities

The final part of the workshop will address ways in which to build on the event. Possibilities for discussion include:

Submission Requirements & Review Process

Participation will be limited to 15, with papers selected by the organizing committee.

Authors should indicate clearly if there are associated demonstrations that they will bring.

Position papers should not exceed 6 A4 pages total (12 point font, single column).

Preferred format: HTML (but Word and RTF also accepted)

Submissions should be e-mailed to Simon Buckingham Shum <sbs@acm.org> by:

7th October

Notification of acceptance:

5th November
-- followed by pre-workshop online discussions.

Organizing Committee

Simon Buckingham Shum (Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK)
Chad Carr (Northern Illinois University, USA)
Jeffrey Conklin (Group Decision Support Systems, Inc., USA)
Thomas Gordon (German National Research Center for Information Technology, Germany)
Albert M. Selvin ( Bell Atlantic Corporation, USA)
Michael Twidale (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA)

 

Workshop Chair's Contact Details:

Simon Buckingham Shum
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, U.K.
E-mail: sbs@acm.org
WWW: http://kmi.open.ac.uk/sbs
Tel: +44 (1908) 655723
Fax: +44 (1908) 653169