Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open University

PHF’s Learning Futures programme

The Learning Futures programme at the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, is rethinking and modelling what goes on in our schools. Here’s the project summary,  starting with a spot-on quote from the Open U’s Chancellor. Good also to see the emphasis on open source and Open Educational Resources.

Learning Futures Summary

“It is time to hold up our hands and admit that our education system just isn’t working well enough. Our emphasis needs not to be on proving the residual value of outdated curricula, tests and league tables, but on inspiring and challenging children so that they in turn can inspire and challenge us.”
David Puttnam

The Learning Futures programme is a collaboration between the Paul Hamlyn Foundation and the Innovation Unit with a simple aim: to have more young people actively and positively engaged in their learning, achieve better outcomes and retain a commitment to learning beyond school.

The £1.2m programme has grown out of the extraordinary success of its predecessor, Musical Futures. This radical innovation in teaching music in high-school has grown from less than 20 participating schools, to almost half of all high schools in England, and pilots in numerous other countries.

A number of success factors were identified in re-energising young people’s motivation:

  • Co-constructing curriculum and pedagogy with students;
  • Integrating the informal out-of-school learning which motivates students, into the more formal context of the classroom;
  • Making the learning processes and content more relevant to young people’s lived experiences;
  • Changing the learner-teacher mix – utilising students as leaders, teachers as students, through coaching, mentoring and the use of experts in business and the community.

We believe that radically re-focusing teaching and learning in high schools is possible through a rigorous and disciplined approach to innovation in these four areas. But we also believe that, for innovation to scale-up, materials and tools must be developed which are ‘open source’: freely available for adaption and adoption by other schools and practitioners. We are therefore working with 40 schools (across 15 ‘sites’) in England over the next two years to trial, test, and document successful innovations across our four key areas. Our goals for the next phase of the project (2011-13) will be to:

  • Make freely available tools for change;
  • Evaluate the impact;
  • Support the scaling of Learning Futures practices across the country
  • Exert policy influence to support educational change

Modelling Scholarly Debate: Neil Benn PhD

Another of the Hypermedia Discourse group’s students, Neil Benn, passed his thesis viva in July, with a strong defence of his dissertation Modelling Scholarly Debate: Conceptual Foundations for Knowledge Domain Analysis Technology. Co-supervised with John Domingue (KMi) and Clara Mancini (formerly KMi and now in Computing), Neil’s work picked up the challenge raised in previous work by the group (IJHCS article), namely to use a  constrained set of “Cognitive Coherence Relations” (CCR) to model in a uniform way the relationships between publications, people and arguments.

I’m really excited about the result of the work, as summarised in Neil’s abstract:

Knowledge Domain Analysis (KDA) research investigates computational support for users who desire to understand and/or participate in the scholarly inquiry of a given academic knowledge domain. KDA technology supports this task by allowing users to identify important features of the knowledge domain such as the predominant research topics, the experts in the domain, and the most influential researchers. This thesis develops the conceptual foundations to integrate two identifiable strands of KDA research: Library and Information Science (LIS), which commits to a citation-based Bibliometrics paradigm, and Knowledge Engineering (KE), which adopts an ontology-based Conceptual Modelling paradigm. A key limitation of work to date is its inability to provide machine-readable models of the debate in academic knowledge domains. This thesis argues that KDA tools should support users in understanding the features of scholarly debate as a prerequisite for engaging with their chosen domain.

To this end, the thesis proposes a Scholarly Debate Ontology which specifies the formal vocabulary for constructing representations of debate in academic knowledge domains. The thesis also proposes an analytical approach that is used to automatically detect clusters of viewpoints as particularly important features of scholarly debate. This approach combines aspects of both the Conceptual Modelling and Bibliometrics paradigms. That is, the method combines an ontological focus on semantics and a graph-theoretical focus on structure in order to identify and reveal new insights about viewpoint-clusters in a given knowledge domain. This combined ontological and graph-theoretical approach is demonstrated and evaluated by modelling and analysing debates in two domains. The thesis reflects on the strengths and limitations of this approach, and considers the directions which this work opens up for future research into KDA technology.

The thesis is published as a KMi Technical Report:

Benn, N.J.L. (2009). Modelling Scholarly Debate: Conceptual Foundations for Knowledge Domain Analysis Technology. Doctoral Dissertation, available as: Technical Report KMI-09-04, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-09-04.pdf

A distillation of work midway through the project was presented as:

Benn, N., Buckingham Shum, S. Domingue, J. and Mancini, C. (2008). Ontological Foundations for Scholarly Debate Mapping Technology2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA ‘08), 28-30 May, 2008, Toulouse, France. IOS Press

Extending Compendium for choreographic video annotation

We have now added Movie Maps to our Compendium tool. A given idea (i.e. hypertext node) can now be embedded in both time (one or more clips within one or more movies) and space (one or more locations within one or more movies). Because that’s how themes, resonances and meaning manifest.

Movie Maps can be linked into and out of just like any normal Map, so you can use all the usual Compendium strategies for making and managing meaningful connections between ideas:

  • the appearance/disappearance of a node (of any sort) to highlight something of interest in a clip (including a map containing your analysis)
  • direct graphical links to make visual connections into/out of/between clips
  • transclusion (or embedding as we’re now calling it) whereby a node appearing in a clip is embedded in other maps (including of course, other movies)
  • tags, whereby the clip shares one or more common features with other nodes, within or outside the movie

This has been developed working closely with choreographers who specialise in the use of digital media to play with time and space in dance, in the context of the e-Dance project: I just posted this description in more detail on the e-Dance Project website:

edance-demo

This series of movies brings together Choreography researcher Sita Popat and myself, who demonstrate and discuss the adaptation of one of the project’s e-Science tools for Choreography, the Open University’s Compendium tool for mapping ideas and annotating media. Acknowledgements to Michelle Bachler (Open U.) and Andrew Rowley (U. Manchester) for expert software development, and webcast wizard Ben Hawkridge (Open U.) for helping us migrate the footage to Web. High-resolution versions of the screen recordings are linked to the relevant tracks.

The video-enabled version of Compendium will be going into alpha release this month with invited testers, for full release within a couple of months.

The academic context for this work is set out in a recent article:

Bailey, H., Bachler, M., Buckingham Shum, S., Le Blanc, A., Popat, S., Rowley, A. and Turner, M. (2009). Dancing on the Grid: Using e-Science Tools to Extend Choreographic Research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 13 July 2009, Vol. 367, No. 1898, pp. 2793-2806. [PDF]

SocialLearn update from Martin Bean

Open U’s VC-Designate Martin Bean keynoted at the ALT-C’09 conference a few days ago, giving many people a first taste of his energy and style!

Check out the vision he has for learner-centred technology, setting the context for the SocialLearn platform, which is where I’m directing most of my energies these days…

Webcast replay of Martin Bean keynote at ALT-C 2009

Webcast replay [start from Slide 39 for SocialLearn] / Open U’s Cloudworks site for ALT-C

ESSENCE workshop podcasts

Just a note to say the podcasts from our ESSENCE project workshop are now up, allowing you to watch some of the leaders in the field of online argumentation and deliberation present updates of their work and demo their systems… Jack Park, David Price, Mark Klein, Luca Iandoli, Aldo de Moor and Anna De Liddo

essence-podcasts

W3C Scientific Discourse task group

Tim Clark of the W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group has kindly invited me to introduce my work today to the Scientific Discourse task group

Dialectical Argumentation Machines: U. Dundee

Some exciting posts available on the Dialectical Argumentation Machines project at the U. Dundee Argumentation Research Group, working with Chris Reed, one the top guys in argumentation modelling, with an intruiging public engagement twist…